Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Moto G7 Plus's 76.1 score. LG V35 ThinQ is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter phone than Moto G7 Plus, although they were only released with a few months difference. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. Motorola Moto G7 Plus has just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate, a 16 MP resolution back facing camera and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG V35 ThinQ features much more memory for applications and games than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better battery performance than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.