Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is better than Moto G7 Plus, having a score of 87.6 against 76.1. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer phone than the Moto G7 Plus, but it's heavier and a bit thicker. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V60 ThinQ has a newer 11 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10, giving you a couple nice extra features.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better looking display than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bigger display. The LG V60 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V60 ThinQ captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor, a lot better video quality and a much more MP camera.
LG V60 ThinQ features a way better battery performance than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.