Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much better than the Motorola Moto G7 Plus, with a global score of 85.3 against 76.1. Both devices we are comparing work with Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and increased performance. Even though the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is notably heavier than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, it's incredibly thinner and also much newer.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a much better resolution of 1892 x 2688 pixels.
Moto G7 Plus shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G7 Plus also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera. The Moto G7 Plus counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a superior battery duration than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.