Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G7 Plus has a global score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G7 Plus has the older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Even when the Moto G7 Plus and the nubia Red Magic 3S were only released 8 months apart, the Moto G7 Plus is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a slightly better screen than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bigger screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S has more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior processor than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much longer battery life than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior camera than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor, a much higher video quality and a way more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.