Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than the Moto G7 Plus, having an 83.8 score against 76.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50 and Moto G7 Plus were only released with a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a little lighter and just a little thinner. The Galaxy A50 has a little bit better screen than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit better processing power than Moto G7 Plus. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 and Motorola Moto G7 Plus have extremely similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a smaller back camera sensor taking worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 1920x1080 video definition, it also counts with a way higher 25 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has longer battery lifetime than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.