Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is much better than Moto G7 Plus's overall score of 76.1. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter phone than the Moto G7 Plus, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should give you identical operating system features.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The Galaxy A50s counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A50s has a bit better CPU than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much better photographs and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has superior battery performance than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.