Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, having an 85.5 score against 76.1. The Galaxy A51 design is newer, just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G7 Plus. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version, providing the user some extra features.
Galaxy A51 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same display density, the Galaxy A51 also has a little bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a bit more powerful processor than Moto G7 Plus. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy A51 shoots better photos and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A51 counts with longer battery lifetime than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.