Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Moto G7 Plus, getting a 90.8 score against 76.1. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 5G has a more recent 11 version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version. Galaxy A51 5G's body is newer, but just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than Moto G7 Plus.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A51 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A51 5G has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of pixels in each inch of screen, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little larger screen.
Galaxy A51 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a much bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G7 Plus, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.