Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Red | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, with a global score of 90.7 against 76.1. Samsung Galaxy A52's design has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, but it is just a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little bit better processing power than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little bit better looking screen than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a greater number of pixels per screen inch, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a quite larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A52 features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy A52 counts with a really longer battery life than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.