Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Red | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is way better than the Moto G7 Plus's global score of 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body has the same thickness than Moto G7 Plus, but it is just a little bit heavier. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10, so it provides you some extra features.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better processing unit than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a better pixel number per inch of display, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G has a better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.