Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is much better than Moto G7 Plus, with a 91.1 score against 76.1. Galaxy A52s is a just a bit heavier cellphone than the Moto G7 Plus, but they are 0.33inches thick. These devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has a more recent 11 version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version, offering some extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy A52s features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same display pixel density, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a bit larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A52s features a much greater memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a much better battery life than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
The Galaxy A52s shoots better photos and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.