Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is a bit better than the Moto G7 Plus, having a 76.9 score against 76.1. Although the Galaxy A70 and the Moto G7 Plus were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy A70 body is a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier. Both of these devices use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit faster processor than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto G7 Plus and Galaxy A70 both have really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A70 has a bit inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Moto G7 Plus takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus also has a larger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy A70 has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.