Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than Moto G7 Plus, having a general score of 92.9 against 76.1. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS, so both should offer the same operating system features. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a just a little bit heavier device than Moto G7 Plus, but both have the same thickness.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little bit better looking display than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a quite worse pixels amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW takes way better videos and photos than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.