Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than Moto G7 Plus, with a 97.6 score against 76.1. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10, giving you some additional features and a performance increase. Although Galaxy Fold and Moto G7 Plus were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy Fold's construction is noticeably heavier but thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold and Moto G7 Plus both count with very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1536 x 2152 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a slightly better camera than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Fold has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Fold has a way better battery lifetime than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 46 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.