Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than Moto G7 Plus's score of 76.1. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's body has the same thickness than Moto G7 Plus, but it's just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better looking screen than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Moto G7 Plus has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution and a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs and a much higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a superior battery duration than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.