Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than Moto G7 Plus's overall score of 76.1. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is newer and a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Moto G7 Plus. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the display and a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater hardware performance than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior battery performance than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better videos and photos than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a much better video quality and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.