Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the Moto G7 Plus's 76.1 score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a lot older than the Moto G7 Plus, it's body is just a little lighter and a little thinner.
Moto G7 Plus counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G7 Plus also has more cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Moto G7 Plus shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the same video frame rates, a 0.38 inches sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G7 Plus also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments.
The Moto G7 Plus has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G7 Plus also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note 5 has a battery duration that is just as good as the battery life in Motorola Moto G7 Plus.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.