Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G7 Plus's overall score of 76.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version, so it gives you some additional features and improved performance. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a newer phone than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, but it's extremely heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little sharper screen than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a greater screen pixels density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a little larger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos, a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera and a much higher video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better storage for apps and games than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.