Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-02-07 | -- |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | -- |
| Blue and Red | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active has a global score of 80.9, which is a bit better than the Moto G7 Plus's general score of 76.1. The Galaxy S6 Active construction is notably lighter but just a bit thicker than the Moto G7 Plus. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a superior processing power than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor. The Galaxy S6 Active features a lot better display than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixel density.
Moto G7 Plus features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S6 Active features a bit better battery lifetime than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Moto G7 Plus shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rate and a 0.38 inches camera sensor, the Moto G7 Plus also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.