Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G7 Plus is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a 76.1 score against 75.8. The Motorola Moto G7 Plus construction is much newer, thinner and a little lighter than the Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active and Moto G7 Plus both feature really similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has an inferior number of cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola Moto G7 Plus features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus also has a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Motorola Moto G7 Plus counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has better battery performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.