Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-02-07 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge has a score of 78.1, which is a bit better than the Moto G7 Plus's 76.1 score. Galaxy S7 edge's design is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than Moto G7 Plus, although it was released many years before. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10, providing you a couple additional features and enhanced performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G7 Plus, although it has 4 lesser cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Moto G7 Plus features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features greater battery performance than Moto G7 Plus, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto G7 Plus captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking worse quality images and videos, and they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G7 Plus also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.