Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Moto G7 Plus's global score of 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is newer than Moto G7 Plus's, although it is a lot thicker and heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G7 Plus. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better looking display than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Moto G7 Plus takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a lower image quality, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with a lot higher 16 mega pixels resolution.
Moto G7 Plus and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro have similar memory capacity to store more games and applications, they have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.