Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G7 Plus's general score of 76.1. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Motorola Moto G7 Plus has Android 10. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a little heavier than the Motorola Moto G7 Plus, it's thinner and newer.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little faster processing unit than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better screen than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a quite larger screen and a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Z Flip has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality, a camera with a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.