Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, with a overall score of 85.6 against 76.1. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version, giving you lots of additional features and increased performance. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is way newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little heavier than the Motorola Moto G7 Plus.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little larger display and a quite better display pixels density.
Motorola Moto G7 Plus has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a larger aperture and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels. The Motorola Moto G7 Plus has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little longer battery lifetime than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.