Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Moto G7 Plus, with a general score of 92.3 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Moto G7 Plus, but it's a little bit heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a more powerful processing unit than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better looking display than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a just a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen, a bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition, a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.