Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Moto G7 Plus, with a overall score of 94.6 against 76.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than Moto G7 Plus. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple additional features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better looking screen than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a quite better processing power than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better camera than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality, a tinier camera aperture and a back facing camera with a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior battery performance than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 50% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.