Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than Motorola Moto G7 Power, having an 88.1 score against 72.6. Although iPhone X is older than Motorola Moto G7 Power, it's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The iPhone X counts with a better performance than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the iPhone X also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone X has a much more vibrant screen than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a much greater screen pixel density. The iPhone X shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and the same (4K) video resolution, the iPhone X also counts with higher video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture.
The iPhone X features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Moto G7 Power features a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84 percent larger battery size.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto G7 Power, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.