Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 279 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power's overall score of 72.6. IPhone XR's design is a little lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, although both of them were released with only a few months difference. The iPhone XR features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 828 x 1792 resolution and a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The Apple iPhone XR counts with a more powerful CPU than Moto G7 Power, because although it has lesser cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone XR also counts with a 64 bits CPU. IPhone XR counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 12 megapixels resolution camera, the iPhone XR also has a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Moto G7 Power features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G7 Power features a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7 Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G7 Power, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.