Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, getting a general score of 77.1 against 72.6. Even though Asus ROG Phone and Motorola Moto G7 Power were released only 3 months apart, the Asus ROG Phone construction is just a little thinner but also a little heavier. The Asus ROG Phone counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Asus ROG Phone counts with a little better performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone also has 5 GB more RAM. The Asus ROG Phone counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Moto G7 Power counts with greater battery lifetime than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Moto G7 Power features a lot better camera than Asus ROG Phone, although it has a smaller sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Moto G7 Power, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.