Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is better than the Moto G7 Power's score of 72.6. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel is way older than Moto G7 Power, it's body is notably lighter and a little bit thinner. The Google Pixel features a brighter display than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot more pixels per screen inch.
The Google Pixel has a processing unit that's just as good as the Moto G7 Power one, because although the Google Pixel has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel features a bit better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a back facing camera with a better 12.3 megapixels resolution.
The Google Pixel features a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G7 Power features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Moto G7 Power, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.