Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is much better than the Moto G7 Power, getting a general score of 80 against 72.6. Google Pixel 3's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Moto G7 Power, even though both of them were released only a couple months apart. Google Pixel 3 counts with a brighter screen than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a lot better pixel density.
Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 has a little faster processor than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Pixel 3 also has a camera with a better 12.2 megapixels resolution, a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 costs more money than Moto G7 Power, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.