Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is better than the Moto G7 Power, getting a score of 80.7 against 72.6. Although Google Pixel 3 XL and the Moto G7 Power were released only a few months apart, Google Pixel 3 XL is thinner and a little lighter. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better looking display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a much better screen density.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Moto G7 Power counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a better resolution back facing camera and a larger camera sensor capturing better quality photographs and videos.
Google Pixel 3 XL is a lot more expensive than the Moto G7 Power, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.