Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, getting a global score of 78.8 against 72.6. Google Pixel 3a's design is thinner and noticeably lighter than Motorola Moto G7 Power, even when both of them were only released 3 months apart. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
Google Pixel 3a has a bit superior processor than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3a also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 3a counts with a better screen than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2220px and way more pixels per inch of display.
Google Pixel 3a has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel 3a also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos, a more MP back facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Moto G7 Power counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 3a costs more money than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.