Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the Moto G7 Power's 72.6 general score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a XL has the older 11 version while Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. Google Pixel 3a XL's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G7 Power, even though they were only released 3 months apart.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has more RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with just a bit better screen than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a much higher 1080 x 2160 resolution.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a slightly better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a bigger aperture, a better 12.2 megapixels resolution back camera and a bigger back camera sensor.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Moto G7 Power counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a XL costs more money than Moto G7 Power, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.