Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is much better than the Moto G7 Power's global score of 72.6. The Google Pixel 4 is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than Moto G7 Power, even though they were released with only 9 months difference. The Google Pixel 4 features a little faster processor than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels. The Google Pixel 4 captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 4 also has a back camera with a higher resolution, a bigger aperture and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Moto G7 Power features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G7 Power features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G7 Power. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G7 Power, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.