Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is better than Moto G7 Power's 72.6 score. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Moto G7 Power, although both were released only a couple months apart. The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with an incredibly better looking display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a much greater pixels density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. The Moto G7 Power counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a slightly better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger sensor capturing higher quality photos, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and a more megapixels camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G7 Power has longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G7 Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G7 Power, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.