Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is better than the Moto G7 Power, with an 82.9 score against 72.6. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. Google Pixel 4a's design is newer, somewhat thinner and much lighter than Moto G7 Power.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM. Google Pixel 4a features a sharper display than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a way higher count of pixels per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 4a has a slightly better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4a also has a higher 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture and a larger back camera sensor.
Google Pixel 4a has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G7 Power features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7 Power. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto G7 Power, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.