Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is way better than Motorola Moto G7 Power, with an 87.5 score against 72.6. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer phone, and it's also lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G7 Power.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more pixels per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a slightly better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger camera aperture, a more megapixels back-facing camera, a bigger back-facing camera sensor and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Moto G7 Power features improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto G7 Power, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.