Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power's 72.6 general score. The Google Pixel 5 design is newer, thinner and way lighter than the Motorola Moto G7 Power. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit faster processing unit than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 features a brighter display than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much better amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Google Pixel 5 features just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The Moto G7 Power counts with improved battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 5 features a bit better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 5 also has a back-facing camera with a better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture, a larger back camera sensor and better video frame rate.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G7 Power. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto G7 Power, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.