Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Blue | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 279 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is way better than the Moto G7 Power, having a overall score of 92.1 against 72.6. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has 14 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's body is much newer and a little bit thinner than Moto G7 Power's, but it's also heavier.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a superior performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G7 Power, because it has a way better pixels density, a quite larger display and a much better resolution of 1280 x 2800.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has better video frame rate, a lot larger aperture, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a superior storage to install games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 1 TB internal memory capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a little longer battery life than Moto G7 Power, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G7 Power, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.