Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 279 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, having a score of 81 against 72.6. LG G7 ThinQ's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G7 Power, even though both were released only 8 months apart. Both of these phones work with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so both of them should offer all the same OS features.
The LG G7 ThinQ features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per screen inch and a much better 1440 x 3120px resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG G7 ThinQ shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a camera with a way higher 16 MP resolution.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a much better battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
LG G7 ThinQ costs more than the Moto G7 Power, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.