Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is better than Motorola Moto G7 Power, with an 82.7 score against 72.6. Both of these devices use Android OS, but LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even when the LG G8X ThinQ and Motorola Moto G7 Power were released only 9 months apart, the LG G8X ThinQ is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG G8X ThinQ features a sharper display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a quite bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a better amount of pixels per display inch.
LG G8X ThinQ shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG G8X ThinQ also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a bigger camera aperture.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G7 Power features longer battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
LG G8X ThinQ costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G7 Power, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.