Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is better than the Moto G7 Power's general score of 72.6. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has an older 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version. Despite of the fact that LG V30S ThinQ is older than the Moto G7 Power, it's design is notably thinner and lighter.
The LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ features a more vivid screen than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater display density and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a much longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent more battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7 Power. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto G7 Power, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.