Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is much better than Moto G7 Power's global score of 72.6. LG V35 ThinQ is a incredibly lighter and thinner phone than Moto G7 Power, even when they were released only a couple of months apart. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features a way better looking screen than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and a back camera with a way better 16 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G7 Power features a much longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G7 Power, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.