Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is better than the Moto G7 Power, having a global score of 81.2 against 72.6. These devices include Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. The LG V40 ThinQ is a thinner and lighter phone than Moto G7 Power, although both were only released 4 months apart.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a lot better looking display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a little bigger display, a way better pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG V40 ThinQ captures clearer photographs and videos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video resolution and a camera in the back with a 12 megapixels, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better images in low light environments, faster video frame rate and a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality photos and videos.
The LG V40 ThinQ features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto G7 Power has a really longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ costs a lot more than Moto G7 Power, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.