Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Blue | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a global score of 85.3, which is better than Motorola Moto G7 Power's general score of 72.6. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a notably newer and notably thinner cellphone than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, although it's noticeably heavier.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a little better performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a much sharper display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a lot larger display, a lot higher resolution of 1892 x 2688 and a better amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 captures clearer videos and photos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera in the back with a 12 MP resolution, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger camera aperture.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Moto G7 Power counts with a bit longer battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 12% greater battery size.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7 Power. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto G7 Power, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.