Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Moto G7 Power's 72.6 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is way newer, a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto G7 Power.
Moto G7 Power counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit larger display and a higher pixels count per inch of display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much larger sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and faster video frame rate. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.