Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 is a little bit better than Moto G7 Power, with a 77.6 score against 72.6. Both of these phones work with the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system. Moto Z3's design is a lot thinner and way lighter than Moto G7 Power, although both were released only 6 months apart. Motorola Moto Z3 has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160.
Moto Z3 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto Z3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Moto Z3 has just a bit better camera than Moto G7 Power. Both of them have the same resolution camera, the same video resolution, a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same sensor size.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G7 Power, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Moto G7 Power has a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G7 Power. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Moto Z3, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto G7 Power, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.