Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a global score of 75.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G7 Power's general score of 72.6. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing, nubia Red Magic 3S's design is just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G7 Power. These phones use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so they should give you identical OS features.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a quite bigger screen, a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a more powerful processor than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM. Moto G7 Power and nubia Red Magic 3S both feature really similar batteries performance. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much better photos and videos than Moto G7 Power, because it has a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a way more MP back-facing camera, a lot higher video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better photography in low-light environments.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7 Power. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Moto G7 Power, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.