Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a general score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power's general score of 72.6. Nubia Red Magic 5S is a newer cellphone than Motorola Moto G7 Power, although it is just a bit thicker and heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but nubia Red Magic 5S has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a more vivid screen than Moto G7 Power, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a bit bigger display and more pixels per display inch.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations, a much better 64 MP resolution camera and a way better video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G7 Power counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G7 Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 5S, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G7 Power, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.